The Beverly Theatre Guild
Twelve Angry Jurors

Pay: No Pay

Description:

The Beverly Theatre Guild is holding auditions for Twelve Angry Jurors.

The play explores the deliberations of a jury in a homicide trial, in which a dozen jurors decide the fate of a teenager accused of murdering his abusive father. In the beginning, they are nearly unanimous in concluding the youth is guilty, influenced by their own background and upbringing. One juror dissents, declaring him "not guilty", and sows a seed of reasonable doubt. Eventually, they convince the other jurors to look beyond their own personal biases and support a unanimous "not guilty" verdict.

AUDITION LOCATION:
Morgan Park Academy, Main Building at 2153 W. 111th St., Chicago

Sunday, December 8: 5:00 - 9:00 PM
Monday, December 9: 7:00 - 8:30 PM
Callbacks (if needed). Monday, December 9 - 8:30 PM

ROLES TO BE CAST (CASTING WILL BE GENDER-NEUTRAL):

Juror #8
He/she votes "not guilty" during the jury's first vote. Described as "thoughtful" and "gentle," Juror #8 is usually portrayed as the most heroic member of the jury. He'she is devoted to justice and is right away sympathetic toward the 19-year-old defendant. He/she spends the rest of the play urging the others to practice patience and to contemplate the details of the case. He/she thinks that they owe it to the defendant to at least talk about the verdict for a while. A guilty verdict will result in the electric chair; therefore, Juror #8 wants to discuss the relevance of the witness testimony. He/she is convinced that there is reasonable doubt and eventually succeeds in persuading the other jurors to acquit the defendant.

Juror #9
Juror #9 is described in the stage notes as a "mild gentle old [person]...defeated by life and...waiting to die." Despite this bleak description, he/she is the first to agree with Juror #8, deciding that there is not enough evidence to sentence the young man to death and becomes more and more sure of themself as the play proceeds. During Act One, Juror #9 is the first to openly recognize Juror #10's racist attitude, stating that, "What this man/woman says is very dangerous."

Juror #5
This young person is nervous about expressing his/her opinion, especially in front of the elder members of the group. In Act One, his/her allure makes others believe that he/she is the one who changed their mind during the secret vote. But, it wasn't him/her; he/she didn't dare go against the rest of the group yet. However, it is also his/her experience from the slums where he/she grew up, just like the defendant, that will later help other jurors form an opinion of "not guilty."

Juror #11
As a refugee from Europe, Juror #11 has witnessed great injustices. That is why he/she is intent on administering justice as a jury member. He/she sometimes feels self-conscious about his/her foreign accent, but overcomes his/her shyness and is willing to take on a more active part in the decision-making process. He/she conveys a deep appreciation for democracy and America's legal system.

Juror #2
He/she is the timidest person of the group. He/she is easily persuaded by the opinions of others and cannot explain the roots of his/her convictions. In the very beginning, he/she goes along with the general opinion, but soon Juror #8 wins his/her sympathy and he/she begins contributing more, despite his/her shyness. He/she is in the group of the first six jurors to vote "not guilty."

Juror #6
Described as an "honest but dull-witted [person]," Juror #6 is a house painter by trade. He/she is slow to see the good in others but eventually agrees with Juror #8. He/she defies the adversity and pursues the facts, in search of a more complete and objective picture. He/she is the one who calls for another ballot and is also one of the first six pro-acquittal ones.

Juror #7
A slick, superior, and sometimes obnoxious salesperson, Juror #7 admits during Act One that he/she would have done anything to miss jury duty and is trying to get out of it as fast as possible. He/she represents the many real-life individuals who loathe the idea of being on a jury. He/she is also quick to add his/her piece of mind to the conversation. He/she seems to want to condemn the defendant because of the youth's previous criminal record, stating that he/she would have beaten the boy as a child just like the defendant's father did.

Juror #12
He/she is an arrogant and impatient advertising executive. He/she is anxious for the trial to be over so that he/she also can get back to his/her career and his social life. However, after Juror #5 tells the group about his/her knowledge of knife-fights, Juror #12 is the first one to waver in his/her conviction, eventually changing his/her mind to "not guilty."

Foreman (Juror #1)
Non-confrontational, Juror #1 serves as the foreman of the jury. He/she is serious about his/her authoritative role and wants to be as fair as possible. Despite being described as "not overly bright," he/she helps calm down the tensions and moves the conversation onward with professional urgency. Heshe sides with the "guilty" side until, just like Juror #12, he/she changes his/her mind after learning about the details of knife-fighting from Juror #5.

Juror #10
The most abhorrent member of the group, Juror #10 is openly bitter and prejudiced. He/she is quick to stand up and physically approach Juror #8. During Act Three, he/she unleashes his/her bigotry to the others in a speech that disturbs the rest of the jury. Most of the jurors, disgusted by #10's racism, turn their backs on him/her.

Juror #4
A logical, well-spoken stock-broker, Juror #4 urges his/her fellow jurors to avoid emotional arguments and engage in rational discussion. Heshe does not change his/her vote until a witness's testimony is discredited (due to the witness's poor vision).

Juror #3
In many ways, heshe is the antagonist to the constantly calm Juror #8. He/she is immediately vocal about the supposed simplicity of the case and the obvious guilt of the defendant. He/she is quick to lose his/her temper and is often infuriated when Juror #8 and other members disagree with his/her opinions. He/she believes that the defendant is absolutely guilty until the very end of the play. During Act Three, Juror #3's emotional baggage is revealed. His/her poor relationship with his/her own son may have biased his/her views and it is only when he/she comes to terms with this that he/she can finally vote "not guilty."

Time Commitment:

PRODUCTION DATES: Friday, February 14, 7:30 pm; Saturday, February 15th; 7:30 pm, Sunday, February 16, 2:00 pm. Rehearsals and performances at Morgan Park Academy Baer Theatre, 2153 W. 111th Street, Chicago.

Rehearsals are tentatively scheduled for Tuesday and Thursday evenings and Sunday afternoons until tech week. There may be added day/evening rehearsals if needed. Subject to change and based on cast availability.

Material To Prepare:

Auditions will consist of readings from the script. Audition sides will be posted on www.beverlytheatreguild.org prior to auditions. Bring headshot and resume, if available. Please be prepared to provide any prior conflicts/commitments you may have from December 12th through performance weekend (February 16th). Thank you!

The Beverly Theatre Guild is committed to diversity in casting. Age range - 18 years and up. All ages (18+) and types are invited.

Contact Info:

AUDITION DATES & TIMES: Auditions by Appointment - to schedule your appointment please make your selection by signing up via our registration site at www.wejoinin.com/sheets/dmizu

Auditions will be in 30-minute windows, up to 5-people per window.

QUESTIONS: Please email: BTGAuditions@gmail.com. You will receive a reply as soon as possible.

Reply To Email: BTGAuditions@gmail.com
Website: www.wejoinin.com/sheets/dmizu